react-doctor/js-async-reduce-without-awaited-acc
Await the accumulator inside an async .reduce reducer: const acc = await previous; ...; return acc;
- Status
- Active
- Category
- Performance
- Assessment
- Evidence-required risk
- Required evidence
- source code, runtime behavior, measurement
- Default configuration
- Enabled
- Default severity
- warn
Show technical metadata
- Scope
- All supported frameworks
- Active when
- always
- Priority
- 44 (P3)
- Source
- oxlint-plugin-react-doctor
- Rule set
- oxlint-plugin-react-doctor 0.9.3 (prompt schema 2)
- Documentation
- Official documentation
Validation prompt
Confirm the detector match and collect the required evidence before deciding whether an edit is warranted.
Fires on a CallExpression whose callee is a MemberExpression named reduce or reduceRight (non-computed arr.reduce, or computed string-literal arr["reduce"]; dynamic arr[methodName] is NOT matched) when the first argument is an async arrow or function expression whose body contains a direct await, AND either (a) the first parameter is an Identifier (after unwrapping an AssignmentPattern default) that is never the direct argument of an AwaitExpression anywhere in the reducer's own async scope, or (b) the first parameter is a destructured ArrayPattern/ObjectPattern. Crucially, await-detection skips nested function/arrow bodies: an await of the accumulator inside a nested helper does NOT count, so a reducer that only awaits its accumulator inside a helper (yet does any other direct await) still FIRES: only a direct await of the accumulator in the reducer's own scope suppresses it. True suppressions: the reducer already awaits the accumulator directly at the top (const obj = await promise; ... or bare acc = await acc;) so iterations chain correctly; a sync reducer with no async keyword; an async reducer that does no awaits at all. Reviewer-judgment suppression: the detector does NOT distinguish Array.prototype.reduce from a custom stream/observable .reduce API, so any .reduce on a non-Array receiver whose Promise-chaining semantics genuinely differ from Array.prototype.reduce should be suppressed by the reviewer even though the detector would otherwise treat it identically.
Evidence boundary
The diagnostic proves only that the detector’s modeled source pattern matched. It does not prove runtime impact, product intent, rendered failure, or that one remediation is correct.
Establish the environment, repository policy, exceptions, and required rendered or runtime evidence before deciding the occurrence.
Record one outcome:
- Confirmed failure: The required evidence establishes the violation.
- Rejected: A documented exception or false-positive predicate applies.
- Needs evidence: Named evidence can still be collected.
- Unavailable: Required evidence cannot be collected in this run.
- Waived with evidence: An authorized, scoped exception applies to an established failure.
- Observation: The review records an optional tradeoff without claiming a defect.
A waiver records its scope, authority, evidence, and review condition. It is not a pass or false positive.
Default severity is registry metadata. Use the occurrence’s JSON severity after repository configuration when ordering real findings.
Fix prompt
Apply this candidate correction only after the required evidence confirms the risk.
Resolve the accumulator before touching it so each iteration receives the prior resolved value instead of a Promise: rename the parameter to previous and await it first, async (previous, item) => { const acc = await previous; acc[item.id] = await getItem(item); return acc; }, and seed the reduce with Promise.resolve(initial) (e.g. Promise.resolve({})) so iteration 1 also gets a Promise; if the accumulator parameter must keep its name, reassign in place with acc = await acc; (never const acc = await acc; which redeclares the param and is a SyntaxError). For a destructured accumulator (async ([sum, count], item) or async ({ totals }, item)), take a single previous param and destructure after awaiting: async (previous, item) => { const [sum, count] = await previous; ...; return [sum + v, count + 1]; } seeded with Promise.resolve([0, 0]). If the accumulator is currently awaited only inside a nested helper, lift that await into the reducer's own scope. When the work is independent per item, prefer await Promise.all(items.map(...)) over an async reduce entirely. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/reduce
Repository-wide copy prompt
Use this repository-wide prompt only after validating each occurrence. For one occurrence, use the guidance above.
Show repository-wide prompt
Fix every confirmed react-doctor/js-async-reduce-without-awaited-acc diagnostic in the current repository.
Required change:
- Resolve the accumulator before touching it so each iteration receives the prior resolved value instead of a Promise: rename the parameter to previous and await it first, async (previous, item) => { const acc = await previous; acc[item.id] = await getItem(item); return acc; }, and seed the reduce with Promise.resolve(initial) (e.g. Promise.resolve({})) so iteration 1 also gets a Promise; if the accumulator parameter must keep its name, reassign in place with acc = await acc; (never const acc = await acc; which redeclares the param and is a SyntaxError). For a destructured accumulator (async ([sum, count], item) or async ({ totals }, item)), take a single previous param and destructure after awaiting: async (previous, item) => { const [sum, count] = await previous; ...; return [sum + v, count + 1]; } seeded with Promise.resolve([0, 0]). If the accumulator is currently awaited only inside a nested helper, lift that await into the reducer's own scope. When the work is independent per item, prefer await Promise.all(items.map(...)) over an async reduce entirely. See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/reduce.
Validation before editing:
Fires on a CallExpression whose callee is a MemberExpression named reduce or reduceRight (non-computed arr.reduce, or computed string-literal arr["reduce"]; dynamic arr[methodName] is NOT matched) when the first argument is an async arrow or function expression whose body contains a direct await, AND either (a) the first parameter is an Identifier (after unwrapping an AssignmentPattern default) that is never the direct argument of an AwaitExpression anywhere in the reducer's own async scope, or (b) the first parameter is a destructured ArrayPattern/ObjectPattern. Crucially, await-detection skips nested function/arrow bodies: an await of the accumulator inside a nested helper does NOT count, so a reducer that only awaits its accumulator inside a helper (yet does any other direct await) still FIRES: only a direct await of the accumulator in the reducer's own scope suppresses it. True suppressions: the reducer already awaits the accumulator directly at the top (const obj = await promise; ... or bare acc = await acc;) so iterations chain correctly; a sync reducer with no async keyword; an async reducer that does no awaits at all. Reviewer-judgment suppression: the detector does NOT distinguish Array.prototype.reduce from a custom stream/observable .reduce API, so any .reduce on a non-Array receiver whose Promise-chaining semantics genuinely differ from Array.prototype.reduce should be suppressed by the reviewer even though the detector would otherwise treat it identically.
Constraints:
- Make the smallest change that fixes the root cause.
- Preserve behavior and interfaces unrelated to this diagnostic.
- Reuse existing project components, utilities, and conventions.
- Preserve resource ownership and cleanup. Do not move work into a hotter render or frame path.
- If syntax proves only a candidate cost, require a relevant trace, bundle report, payload measurement, or metric before editing.
- Without evidence, record Needs evidence. Compare the same scenario before and after; keep the change only when its target metric improves without regression.
- Adapt identifiers and framework details instead of copying blindly.
- Do not disable the rule or suppress matching code.
Assessment:
- Record detector evidence, applicability facts, assumptions, missing evidence, and the rule class for this occurrence.
- Return one outcome: Confirmed failure, Rejected, Needs evidence, Unavailable, Waived with evidence, or Observation.
- A waiver records the established failure, scope, authority, evidence, and review or expiry condition. It is not a pass or false positive.
Verification:
- Run focused tests for the changed behavior.
- Run React Doctor and confirm this diagnostic no longer appears from changed code.
- Run an unfiltered scan of the affected scope before claiming no cross-category regression.
- Report the files changed and any checks you could not run.